In 2024, global temperature has temporarily exceeded +1.5°C compared to the pre-industrial era (Copernicus Climate Service). Permanent crossing is expected between 2027 and 2030 according to the IPCC. Each additional tenth of a degree exponentially increases extreme events.
Sources : Copernicus Climate Service, GIEC AR6, Swiss Re sigma, BloombergNEF.
Paris Accords signed by 196 countries but global emissions keep rising (+1.1% in 2025). Massive gap between promises and actions.
Massive greenwashing. Companies' net-zero commitments are rarely independently verified. ESG scores are declarative and not comparable.
Strong citizen mobilization (Fridays for Future, Just Stop Oil). Wide awareness but politically fragmented.
The countries most vulnerable to climate change are the least emitters. Climate justice is nearly zero. The promised funds ($100B/year) are not delivered.
COP after COP without binding outcomes. Climate fatigue is set in among decision-makers and the public.
Science is clear (IPCC AR6: « unequivocal ») but fossil lobbying and disinformation blur the signal.
Confused European green taxonomy. ESG scores not comparable across agencies. No global standard.
Extreme events on the rise (+30% in 10 years). Insurers withdraw from some zones. Growing instability.
Investissements renouvelables record (500 Md$/an en 2025, BloombergNEF). Innovation forte Mays insufficiente vs besoin.
Each dimension is raised to its weighting — it's a geometric product, not a simple average. The lowest score drags the whole system down.
EQΦS aggregates the 9 axiss via a weighted geometric product — not an average. The expanded form and coefficients of the Codex Universalis remain proprietary.
Codex constants are protected. Only φ = 1.618… (golden ratio) is public.
Λ = 0.3973
φ(S) = 0.300
X(S) = 0.776
projected utility = 0.4203
ethical safeguard = -0.060 → BLOCAGE ABSOLU
Audit your real carbon footprint, not declarative. Scope 1 + 2 + 3 measured, not estimated. Independent verification. Most companies underestimate their scope 3 by 40 to 60%. Impact: integrity from 0.380 → 0.55.
Identify your physical thresholds. At what temperature does your supply chain break? What flood level endangers your site? EQΦS projects physical trajectories, not only financial ones. Impact: stability from 0.280 → 0.45.
Measure the cost of inaction vs transition investment. Swiss Re estimates climate damages at $2,500B/year by 2030. Compare with your transition cost. The ratio is almost always in favor of action. Impact: clarity from 0.350 → 0.50.
Projeter Stability to t+5 et t+10 ans. Structural stability decreases with each additional degree. EQΦS projects the temporal trajectory and identifies the tipping year. Impact: long-term vision for the COMEX.
You just read the proof.
Computed on your data, your case, your framing. Not an opinion — a reproducible mathematical verdict.