Decision engine guide - EQOS Asia

Decision matrix template: a ready structure for your decision

Summarise this page with AI

The essentials in 30 seconds

  • A decision matrix template is a reusable sheet of 6 blocks: header, criteria, options, ratings, totals, and checks.
  • Weights sum to 100 and ratings share one 1 to 10 scale.
  • One SUMPRODUCT formula per option returns the weighted total.
  • In the vendor example, Alpha scores 7.25, Gamma 6.90, and Beta 6.85.
  • The EQOS Asia decision engine adds a 9-dimension view (EQOS Asia method page, as of October 2026).

A decision matrix template is a sheet with the same blocks every time, so that each new choice starts from a proven layout. This page lists the blocks, the formulas, and a filled example with illustrative figures, as of October 2026. The template supports the steps of a weighted decision matrix and makes the result easy to review and reuse.

What should a decision matrix template contain?

A useful template holds six blocks: a header, a criteria list with weights, the options, the ratings, the totals, and a check area. Each block has a fixed place on the sheet, so a reviewer finds the same information in the same cell for every decision. A template with fewer blocks hides assumptions, and one with more blocks slows the team without improving the answer.

The header names the decision in one sentence, the owner, the date, and the deadline. The criteria list gives each criterion a definition and a weight. The check area confirms that the weights sum to 100 and that no cell is empty. The figure shows the blocks from top to bottom.

Six blocks of a decision matrix template: header, criteria, options, ratings, totals, checks
The six blocks of a decision matrix template, from the header to the check area.

How should a decision matrix template lay out rows and columns?

Put criteria in rows and options in columns. The first column holds the criterion name, the second the weight, and each option takes two columns: one for the rating and one for the evidence note. This layout keeps the weights next to the names, lets a reader scan a whole option from top to bottom, and leaves room for a fifth option without redesign.

Reserve the last rows for the weighted total, the rank, and the gap to the leader. Freeze the header rows so the names stay visible while the sheet scrolls. Colour only the input cells, for example pale yellow, and leave formula cells plain. A reader then sees at once which cells can change and which cells compute.

Which formulas total the scores in a decision matrix template?

One formula does most of the work. Multiply each rating by its weight and add the products: in a spreadsheet, SUMPRODUCT takes the weight column and one rating column and returns the weighted total. Divide by 100 when the weights sum to 100, so the total stays on the same 1 to 10 scale as the ratings. Copy the formula across the option columns.

Two helper formulas complete the sheet. A rank formula orders the totals from the highest to the lowest, and a sum formula over the weight column must return 100. When the sum differs, the sheet shows a warning in the check area. These three formulas are enough for a template that a whole team can audit in a few minutes.

Where do evidence notes belong in a decision matrix template?

Every rating deserves one line of evidence: a figure, a quote, a document name, or a date. Place the note in the column beside the rating, so the number and its reason travel together. A rating of 8 for reliability becomes a claim that can be checked when the note reads uptime report, 12 months, sent by the vendor.

Add a short confidence mark next to each note, such as high, medium, or low. Ratings with low confidence are the first candidates for a second source before the decision. The mark takes seconds to fill and shows the reader where the matrix rests on opinion and where it rests on documents.

What does a filled decision matrix template look like for three vendors?

Take three software vendors, Alpha, Beta, and Gamma, with illustrative figures. The weights are price 35, reliability 30, support 20, and integration 15. Alpha is rated 6, 8, 7, and 9, which gives 2.10 + 2.40 + 1.40 + 1.35, or 7.25. Beta is rated 9, 6, 5, and 6, which gives 3.15 + 1.80 + 1.00 + 0.90, or 6.85.

Gamma is rated 7, 7, 8, and 5, which gives 2.45 + 2.10 + 1.60 + 0.75, or 6.90. Alpha ranks first, Gamma second, and Beta third. The gap between Gamma and Beta is only 0.05 points, so the template flags the pair as too close to separate. Alpha leads both by a clear margin and becomes the option to test further.

Table of weighted totals and ranks for vendors Alpha, Gamma, and Beta in the illustrative example
Weighted totals and ranks for the three illustrative vendors.

How do you reuse and version a decision matrix template?

Keep one clean master copy and duplicate it for each decision. Name every copy with the decision and the date, for example vendor choice 2026-10, and never overwrite the master. When the team learns that a criterion was missing or a definition was vague, change the master once and note the change in a version line at the top.

Store finished matrices in one folder. After six months, open the folder and compare what the matrices predicted with what happened. A criterion that never separated the options can leave the template, and a criterion that explained a surprise earns a place. The archive turns a sheet into a small record of the team’s judgement.

When does a decision matrix template need a decision engine?

A template serves one decision at a time, with ratings that people supply. It reaches its limit when the same ratings are argued every quarter or when the criteria interact. The EQOS Asia decision engine measures a situation on 9 structural dimensions and returns a φ(S) score between 0 and 1 from a deterministic core (EQOS Asia method page, as of October 2026).

The documented method fixes the dimensions in advance, so two analysts reach the same score from the same facts. A reader can try a first score in the simulator on a real choice, and compare it with the matrix. The two views often agree, and the gaps point to the assumptions worth discussing before the commitment.

Frequently asked questions

What is a decision matrix template?

A decision matrix template is a reusable sheet with fixed blocks: a header, weighted criteria, options, ratings, totals, and checks. Each new decision copies the master and fills the input cells. The fixed layout lets a reviewer find the same information in the same place every time and spot gaps quickly.

Can I build a decision matrix template in a spreadsheet?

Yes. A spreadsheet needs one SUMPRODUCT formula per option, a rank formula, and a sum check on the weights. Mark the input cells with a colour and keep the formula cells plain. The sheet fits on one screen for four to six criteria and three to five options.

How many options and criteria should the template allow?

Allow room for 5 options and 6 criteria. That space covers most business choices without crowding the sheet. Leave extra columns hidden rather than deleted, so the formulas keep working when a team adds a fourth or fifth option late in the process.

Does the EQOS Asia pre-diagnostic replace the template?

No. The template organises the team’s own judgement, and the free 30-minute pre-diagnostic applies the EQOS Asia equation to the same decision across 9 dimensions. Held by video in Singapore time (SGT) under NDA, it adds a second view to compare with the matrix (EQOS Asia contact page, as of October 2026).

Test your knowledge

1. How many blocks does the template in this guide contain?

  • Four
  • Six
  • Nine
Show the answer

Six.

2. What must the weights of the template sum to?

  • 10
  • 100
  • 1,000
Show the answer

100.

3. Which option ranks first in the vendor example?

  • Beta
  • Gamma
  • Alpha
Show the answer

Alpha.

4. What is the weighted total for Gamma?

  • 6.90
  • 7.25
  • 6.85
Show the answer

6.90.

5. Where does an evidence note sit in the layout?

  • In a separate file
  • Beside the rating
  • Below the totals
Show the answer

Beside the rating.

About the author

Portrait of Stéphane Jambu

Stéphane Jambu

President, EQOS Forecast Asia

Stéphane Jambu leads EQOS Forecast Asia and works as a consultant in e-commerce, search visibility, and AI. LinkedIn profile

Sources: EQOS Asia method page (eqos-asia.com/method.html), simulator page (eqos-asia.com/simulator.html), and contact page (eqos-asia.com/contact.html), consulted on 22 October 2026. Page updated on 22 October 2026.